That's called pluralism and openness in science, and generally considered a good thing. All I see here are heuristics to convey politics.
-
-
Replying to @strijkers @ErichMSchwarz and
I'm still waiting for the scientific evidence that links any sex-related trait, at all, to predictive success at software development tasks.
6 replies 2 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @crashfrog @ErichMSchwarz and
But that is the whole point! Regardless the obvious need for more diversity, we shouldn't stop investigating scientific questions.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @strijkers @crashfrog and
What seems the scientific consensus: is discrimination real? YES. Might there be biol. differences as well? We don't know, let's investigate
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @strijkers @ErichMSchwarz and
sorry, is it "we don't know", or is it settled science? Because Damore and his defender say it's been settled.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @crashfrog @strijkers and
except for the part, of course, where they have any scientific evidence at all for any traits that predict you'll be good at code.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @crashfrog @strijkers and
but hey, if you're over here on the "there's no good science on this" side, welcome, friend. while we're talking, tho, women need jobs
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @crashfrog @strijkers and
and since all of us know women who can program, but didn't get the same breaks as us dudes, maybe let's not just write them off, huh?
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @crashfrog @strijkers and
and while we're at it, maybe preferential hiring for women would avoid hiring puffed-up fakers, who usually seem to be dudes
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @crashfrog @strijkers and
since that's a big problem in the workplace, too.
3 replies 1 retweet 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
