Maybe previous research has asked the wrong questions. Certainly it hasn't provided answers otherwise people wouldn't still be arguing.
-
-
Replying to @GregoryHickok
This line of thinking is flaming garbage. Science isn't the ultimate settler, culture + context have a huge role to play in what is accepted
2 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @DaniRabaiotti @GregoryHickok
"Science" is how we settle issues without resorting to religious faith. Or brute force. Dismissing science is not necessarily a good idea.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @ErichMSchwarz @GregoryHickok
At no point ever in my life have I dismissed science
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Ok, so what about this?: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/no-the-google-manifesto-isnt-sexist-or-anti-diversity-its-science/article35903359/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @strijkers @DaniRabaiotti and2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @strijkers @DaniRabaiotti and
Isn't this whole debate ridiculously conflated by (incorrectly) merging attitudes/politics with core scientific debate? >
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Get out my tl with your garbage non scientific (+ partisan) articles and come back when you've read into this field properly
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @DaniRabaiotti @strijkers and
You see as a zoologist this all seems so bizarre because the level of evidence presented to shore up these views simply wouldn't stand.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Here's one to make you laugh: https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/10/16127968/fired-google-engineer-compares-high-paid-tech-job-to-soviet-forced-labor …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
