And if e.g. a climate change denier uses open data, all the better. This only makes it easier to scrutinise their claims! #HowItShouldBe
-
-
If a nasty overbearing professor bullies a PhD student on social media about their research, this allows you to challenge them publicly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I find this far preferable than when they do this by attacking them at a conference or ripping into them anonymously in peer review.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It puts them out in the open & shows them for what they are. And this allows others to come to their defense because
#ItIsTheRightThingToDo3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
To me "open science" is a way of doing research. Nothing more to it than that (actually it's challenging enough!)
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Couldn't one say that "uncorrupt democracies are just democracies" yet still have a movement against government corruption?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You've probably missed most of this endless thread. I have no issue with the process of change being called a movement. Not the same thing
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @sampendu @richarddmorey and
I guess for same reason I am in no political party, or any clubs, & don't support any sports team (except the All Blacks of course :P)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
But you're in the movement of feminism by virtue of being a feminist? So some movements are OK?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
No. As I said prev, I view this in pretty much the same terms. It's about beliefs & actions. Don't really care to be in any formal movement.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Most movements are informal, but OK. I respect that you don't want to be part of any movement. I just don't agree with the logic behind it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.