E.g. "Disagree with Olivia = Can't be a feminist" is not a philosophy I want much to do with. Doesn't change what I believe & do though.
-
-
I want all people to use open practices of their own free will. It doesn't matter to me if they are inside or outside the movement.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I don't want there to be a movement. I want open practices to become normal. The more people do it irrespective of in-groups the better.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
And if e.g. a climate change denier uses open data, all the better. This only makes it easier to scrutinise their claims!
#HowItShouldBe1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If a nasty overbearing professor bullies a PhD student on social media about their research, this allows you to challenge them publicly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I find this far preferable than when they do this by attacking them at a conference or ripping into them anonymously in peer review.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It puts them out in the open & shows them for what they are. And this allows others to come to their defense because
#ItIsTheRightThingToDo3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
To me "open science" is a way of doing research. Nothing more to it than that (actually it's challenging enough!)
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Couldn't one say that "uncorrupt democracies are just democracies" yet still have a movement against government corruption?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You've probably missed most of this endless thread. I have no issue with the process of change being called a movement. Not the same thing
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Sam Schwarzkopf
So you think there is a movement, but you chose to opt out?https://twitter.com/sampendu/status/894832014498639872 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.