Dunno about "dirty" but when it implies a formalised code & rules esp. with aim to sanction or expel people, then I have no interested in it
-
-
E.g. "Disagree with Olivia = Can't be a feminist" is not a philosophy I want much to do with. Doesn't change what I believe & do though.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
I want all people to use open practices of their own free will. It doesn't matter to me if they are inside or outside the movement.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I don't want there to be a movement. I want open practices to become normal. The more people do it irrespective of in-groups the better.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
And if e.g. a climate change denier uses open data, all the better. This only makes it easier to scrutinise their claims!
#HowItShouldBe1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
If a nasty overbearing professor bullies a PhD student on social media about their research, this allows you to challenge them publicly.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I find this far preferable than when they do this by attacking them at a conference or ripping into them anonymously in peer review.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It puts them out in the open & shows them for what they are. And this allows others to come to their defense because
#ItIsTheRightThingToDo3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
To me "open science" is a way of doing research. Nothing more to it than that (actually it's challenging enough!)
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Diversity/inclusivity is an important goal in its own right. To me it isn't (and shouldn't be) intrinsically linked with research practices.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted CⓐmeronNeylon
I realise you think this. Many others within open science think differently though. See thread by @CameronNeylon:https://twitter.com/CameronNeylon/status/895546085468495873 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.