Dunno about "dirty" but when it implies a formalised code & rules esp. with aim to sanction or expel people, then I have no interested in it
But it's still not clear to me why you feel so hostile to the term movement, which pretty much everybody uses. But I don't actually want to
-
-
continue because I feel like we've been going round in circles with you first claiming you don't mind the term and then back you being
-
against it. Anyway, it's fine not to like it, but you'll meet tons of people who think it's a movement and don't think it's a club.
-
Well, as I said in my post, I have no illusions that I will change anybody's mind over that. The point is that is not how I view it.
-
All my post is laying out my thoughts on this matter. I will try to do my part to make openness universal. Independent of any movement.
-
I hope you will continue to do so by taking into account others' thoughts too — as to get more people doing OS we need healthy dialogue.
-
If I didn't I wouldn't post it on a public blog to be misconstrued by lots of people who didn't bother to even read it ;)
-
Anyway, here's the last part in this endless (for which I am sorry) train of thought so bear with me please before responding halfway thru:
-
Okay, found it! :) I want to be very clear that obviously this doesn't means we shouldn't promote inclusivity in open science affairs 1/3
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.