Ultimately this is why I've moved across to humanities. Science is good at answering carefully posed questions. 13/n
-
-
Replying to @CameronNeylon
Humanities has a great skill set for asking whether those are the *right* questions to be posing, *why* they are being posed that way 14/n
1 reply 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @CameronNeylon
It seems often that the academic humanities aren't good at turning that apparatus on ourselves but the toolkit is at least there 15/n
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @CameronNeylon
The same has been true of
#openscience We talked implicitly about diversity (of outputs, timing contributors) but not explicitly enough 16/n1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @CameronNeylon
...so we missed the general point. That diversity and inclusion are the core epistemological priors of the general argument 17/n
2 replies 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @CameronNeylon
How do we fix that? Well to start with, shut up and listen when URM raise issues. Because its testing our claims in wider contexts 18/n
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @CameronNeylon
Fundamentally its just good scholarship. General knowledge claims need to find purchase/application in diverse contexts... 19/20
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @CameronNeylon
...the only way to test that is to work towards greater diversity & inclusion. Listen to those wider contexts. It's just good research 20/20
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @CameronNeylon
Took many ppl with sufficient patience to lead me to this. But can find many who will challenge your perspectives productively around here
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @CameronNeylon
Would tweet a list but horrid twitter tagging system now will likely clag up their streams with even more shit than they already deal with
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
