Yep, I agree with Chris (as I usually do). There's no clear line, but biggest clear diff is that cog would be humans only
-
-
Yea so it seems cog neuro would be my choice under that definition, I actually thought behavioral neuro was the human and animal side of it
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
It is, technically. Just depends on lab's interpretation etc
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
I'm terrified of picking the wrong path, I've been in love with neuro forever and edu is ridiculous expensive here so no room to play around
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Oh, absolutely.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @_Astro_Nerd_ and
I have a PhD from a Behavioral Neuro Dept... But do Cog neuro. I took a lot of animal model based classes, learned cog neuro "on the job"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @LDrogosPhD @o_guest and
Do even if you decide to do the "other" one, you should be fine! I also find being fluent in animal & human work very helpful!
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @LDrogosPhD @o_guest and
If I have it my way I'd def want to be fluent in both, I'm a serial learner. Thank you for your input!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @_Astro_Nerd_ @o_guest and
If it helps, don't think of them as different fields. It's the same questions being asked with different models/different levels of inquiry.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @LDrogosPhD @_Astro_Nerd_ and
Oh, yeah certainly. My current project is babies, rats, and pigeons.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
INB4: yes, really.https://now.uiowa.edu/2016/06/faculty-delta-center-grant …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.