So no, not "nah". Sorry that you feel that open science doesn't have to work harder to be inclusive but I won't stand by and let you
Also slight tangent. But when a person expresses an opinion and many people disagree openly it is a message. The context affects what the
-
-
message is but it's usually something along the lines of "this isn't a good view point, ideally don't express it again".
-
I personally, very strongly believe in my opinions and do not think not speaking out on this issue (inclusivity in open science) is even an
-
option for me. If I fall, we all (= ERCs, URMs) fall (to a certain extent).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
