I didn't know about the other poll, have changed that now. I was just interested based on something I read this morning. That's all.
-
-
It's confusing especially since it keeps coming back as a huge theme every time I bring it up with exactly the same people, even though prev
-
they seemed to agree after 100s of tweets. Maybe I just need a green beard
@blahah404 or maybe I should just not express my views.
-
well, I value your perspective even when I disagree with it, so I hope you continue!
-
That is really sweet. I have to admit this isn't the vibe I get from many others.
-
Also slight tangent. But when a person expresses an opinion and many people disagree openly it is a message. The context affects what the
-
message is but it's usually something along the lines of "this isn't a good view point, ideally don't express it again".
-
I personally, very strongly believe in my opinions and do not think not speaking out on this issue (inclusivity in open science) is even an
-
option for me. If I fall, we all (= ERCs, URMs) fall (to a certain extent).
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Common
@o_guest, I am a dude and don't agree. you truly believe that is because I don't like you or your gender? Maybe I simply don't agree -
women 27x more likely to be victims of online abuse. Translate to violently disagreeing/arguing on social media? http://networkedintelligence.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Cyber_violence_Gender-report.pdf …
-
I certainly wouldn't deny this is true and despicable! But for a post on your movement argument (admittedly haven't read them all)?
-
I have no reason to believe that a „smaller scale“ version of this could not exist in the context here w/ women targeted based on gender.
-
Perhaps the specific "scientific" context made me naive indeed, but my point rather is 'at that small scale' how do you filter out /1
-
genuine disagreement (and yes, I can be an a-hole, but I do believe I am an a-hole to everyone equally) from sexist idiots?
-
that’s the problem: you can’t and are always stuck not knowing how much of feedback is just based on gender. As
@o_guest originally wrote. -
solutions for that (beyond twitter; e.g. ms reviews, blind-blind)? Because critique and disagreements are important (especially in sci.)
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.