(2) having exclusive/nonoverlapping answers is weird and (see 1) also biasing.
In fact @blahah404 and I (and others) spend hours last time this same theme rolled around explaining how claiming it's not a movement is a
-
-
play to side-step criticism. And your poll is just another one of these "it's not a movement" type implicit messages.
-
Claiming I don't know where you are coming from or what message you are sending is disingenuous. I know Twitter threads are hard to follow.
-
But you didn't need to reply with "nah". Anyway, I hope some understanding can be reached, but I'm not holding my breath.
-
OK, I never actually said any of these things, so please don't accuse me of that. I've now read your thread, and think it's important.
-
OK, but you implied it with the phrasing of your question and by using it as a reply to
@DaniRabaiotti — be careful. -
You also implied it when you posted this:https://twitter.com/Protohedgehog/status/894831125742465025 …
-
When you say you're not sure how you feel about inclusivity when previously you were for it... well, I say it's a strong message.

-
Glad you think it's important — but it's the same debate we had last time. Does that mean every time this comes up I need to remind you?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.