This is an utterly BS way of asking the question and the onus is on your to fix that and demonstrate you care about asking appropriately.
The bullet points about being tagged in conference threads is me as is the sexism stuff. I explained that to him.
-
-
So no, not "nah". Sorry that you feel that open science doesn't have to work harder to be inclusive but I won't stand by and let you
-
continue. Claiming it's not a movement is how this whole thing started ages ago and still goes on with the same exact people.
-
In fact
@blahah404 and I (and others) spend hours last time this same theme rolled around explaining how claiming it's not a movement is a -
play to side-step criticism. And your poll is just another one of these "it's not a movement" type implicit messages.
-
Claiming I don't know where you are coming from or what message you are sending is disingenuous. I know Twitter threads are hard to follow.
-
But you didn't need to reply with "nah". Anyway, I hope some understanding can be reached, but I'm not holding my breath.
-
OK, I never actually said any of these things, so please don't accuse me of that. I've now read your thread, and think it's important.
-
OK, but you implied it with the phrasing of your question and by using it as a reply to
@DaniRabaiotti — be careful. - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.