I think there is a sentiment, that I share, that there should really be no distinction between open science and science. >
I consider myself in open science because I do open science. I don't agree with everything others in the movement do or say though.
-
-
I didn't claim you were in a clique. That criticism is the one I've been asked my quite a few others to address within psych's open science.
-
And, yes I do have some very cool friends in open science. We're not in an exclusionary clique though.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.