The first and last thing I will ever write about the arse-clenchingly awful 'tone 'debate' in psychology http://neurochambers.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/why-i-hate-tone-debate-in-psychology.html …
-
-
Replying to @chrisdc77
I'm a huge fan/supporter of what you do for science, (look how I am sandwiching my criticism) but I disagree with this post on 3 points:
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chbergma @chrisdc77
1. You can criticize others whichever way you want but don't want to receive criticism? This is what I read to be the overarching point
4 replies 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @chbergma @chrisdc77
2. Sexism/racism and other acts against vulnerable people don't have to be called out? I think they are never OK and shouldn't be dismissed
2 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @chbergma @chrisdc77
3. Pure definition point: open science means open to everyone to me, so being inclusive and accessible is part of my open science goals
1 reply 4 retweets 14 likes
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
I assume you have seen this?https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/889248986984591362 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
