Is this really about Fiske and co? Not twitter?
-
-
Not unless I really misread it. Of course, some criticism does take place on Twitter, but outside that, nope!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yes & that is consistent with everything else Chris has said about this topic. Some was on Twitter of course but more actually on Facebook.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
PsychMAP? I heard some meltdown happened?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I haven't visited in months so not sure but "tone debates" were big there in past. This week it was mostly on Twitter about Primestein.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
For me a lot of twitter was me being tagged in SIPS related posts on inclusivity even though I wasn't even at that conference.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
Gave thoughts here and elsewhere in same thread, as have others:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/893147040942895104 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
So
@sampendu I'm sure you can see my week's experiences have been different and colour my understanding of posts without explicit context.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Perhaps - but I don't see talking about inclusivity or various -isms as being related to "tone". At least I haven't seen it being used such.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
They are related.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ Retweeted Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ
See this side thread (replies above mine too)https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/894109081694326784 …
Olivia Guest | Ολίβια Γκεστ added,
-
-
Yes I can understand why one could interpret it differently. Anyway, it seems this thread has already clarified Chris' intention.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.