The first and last thing I will ever write about the arse-clenchingly awful 'tone 'debate' in psychology http://neurochambers.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/why-i-hate-tone-debate-in-psychology.html …
-
-
Replying to @chrisdc77
I'm a huge fan/supporter of what you do for science, (look how I am sandwiching my criticism) but I disagree with this post on 3 points:
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @chbergma @chrisdc77
1. You can criticize others whichever way you want but don't want to receive criticism? This is what I read to be the overarching point
4 replies 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @chbergma @chrisdc77
Not all tone critiques are good Ines of course.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
A lot of tone policing is oppressive. But not all tone criticism comes from privilege! You can certainly punch up! http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/12/tone-policing-and-privilege/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @PsychScientists and
That link addresses oppressive tone policing. Just to be clear.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @PsychScientists and
But there's certainly room in certain situations where you can ask elite or powerful people to be mindful of their tone, eg if exclusionary.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Angry emails to phd students from PIs might be better rewritten to be less aggressive, thus more supporti and compelling. That's tone.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.