The first and last thing I will ever write about the arse-clenchingly awful 'tone 'debate' in psychology http://neurochambers.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/why-i-hate-tone-debate-in-psychology.html …
-
-
Not unless I really misread it. Of course, some criticism does take place on Twitter, but outside that, nope!
-
Yes & that is consistent with everything else Chris has said about this topic. Some was on Twitter of course but more actually on Facebook.
-
PsychMAP? I heard some meltdown happened?
-
I haven't visited in months so not sure but "tone debates" were big there in past. This week it was mostly on Twitter about Primestein.
-
For me a lot of twitter was me being tagged in SIPS related posts on inclusivity even though I wasn't even at that conference.
-
Gave thoughts here and elsewhere in same thread, as have others:https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/893147040942895104 …
-
So
@sampendu I'm sure you can see my week's experiences have been different and colour my understanding of posts without explicit context. -
Perhaps - but I don't see talking about inclusivity or various -isms as being related to "tone". At least I haven't seen it being used such.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
If so, then it's obviously not directed at me at all. So that's cleared it up.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
