I fail to see what's so hard to interpret. Seems pretty clear to me. Anyway I might just end up writing my own two cents eventually now :P.
-
-
E.g. it's unclear to me whether it's aimed at those of us who've been arguing with SIPS related people about sexism/exclusionary language
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
I can't speak for Chris but I'm pretty sure he's not defending sexism :/ (Any examples of this in this context?). I'll see what I can do!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Maybe you can empathise now with my questions.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'm doing research for my blog post :P. I think I know (some of) the cases Chris complains about which have nothing to do with sexism.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
But I want to know the full range of opinions & perceptions of this issue to help me formulate my own thoughts on this question.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Essentially without examples it's unclear who it's aimed at might make some who've called people out worry that's it's about them.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Okay let me hazard a guess: It's about people complaining about the tone of how some findings are discussed & the existence of
@DrPrimestein1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Anyway, thanks for your pointers. I'll have a deeper look at these aspects before I write it (if I do :P). But need to do real work first ;)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
So the point of writing blog posts is often to clarify your opinion, so hopefully this'll become clear as I still don't know if this is
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
directed at ECRs given the text. 
-
-
It's very likely that everybody knows what this is about except me and
@ed_berry but I don't think that's true.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.