The first and last thing I will ever write about the arse-clenchingly awful 'tone 'debate' in psychology http://neurochambers.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/why-i-hate-tone-debate-in-psychology.html …
I don't know how to interpret it if I'm honest. I prob just live in a diff part of twitter? I assume it's about behaviour on here? 
-
-
I fail to see what's so hard to interpret. Seems pretty clear to me. Anyway I might just end up writing my own two cents eventually now :P.
-
E.g. it's unclear to me whether it's aimed at those of us who've been arguing with SIPS related people about sexism/exclusionary language
-
I can't speak for Chris but I'm pretty sure he's not defending sexism :/ (Any examples of this in this context?). I'll see what I can do!
-
Maybe you can empathise now with my questions.
-
Here's one of many examples latelyhttps://twitter.com/chartgerink/status/893466571594706945 …
-
Still confused about what was so objectionable there? I'm pretty sure non-sexists make sexist comments. Can you clarify?
-
It's been covered in these tweetshttps://twitter.com/blahah404/status/893595798533017600 …
-
terrorists are Muslims, it in no way follows that a Muslim is obviously a terrorist.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.