It's a challenge. "Insider" communication can be double-edged - also serves a useful function for a new group getting organized
-
-
Replying to @hardsci @KojiJTaka and
But that can also feel exclusionary. I don't have a perfect answer, but actively engaging with how to reach diff audiences is important
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @hardsci @KojiJTaka and
SIPS (as an organization) will need to think about how to support dissemination of things we produce at the conference
2 replies 0 retweets 15 likes -
Replying to @hardsci @KojiJTaka and
For now, it would be awesome if people did sharing/dissemination ground-up. Share OSF links, write blogs or tweet what you did
2 replies 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @hardsci @KojiJTaka and
Be mindful not to come off as braggy. Better vibe would be, I want to share this cool thing I made for the scientific community
2 replies 0 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @hardsci @KojiJTaka and
Something that I found worrying and perhaps is a symptom of something deeper (?) — even though I am unlikely to attend SIPS — was how many
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
time I have been tagged in discussions on twitter relating to SIPS asking me to discuss inclusivity, anti-sexism, anti-racism.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
It's not my expert subject but I do think that
#openscience depends on inclusivity to be truly open. Anyway, it was very confusing to be1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
dragged into discussions about inclusivity at a conference I have never attended. It can only make me think something was going wrong.
1 reply 2 retweets 7 likes -
Regardless, I wish you the best of luck with SIPS. IMHO, there's an in-group mentality amongst some & I assume you will want to address it.
1 reply 1 retweet 9 likes
Changing culture can be really tough — but there is a will so there will probably be a way. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.