As this is relevant imo for the inclusivity & diversity discussion, cc-ing @o_guest @dingding_peng @mcxfrank @patrickshafto on this.
-
-
I mean, allowing comp. models to generate predictions that are tracked through the literature as they are evaluated. Connecting threads..
-
I wasn't under the impression that it's currently not something that's facilitated/allowed...?
-
My hope is that we can make such theoretical threads more explicit. Currently the only "glue" is in the narrative of the papers, and it >
-
only extends in a backwards direction. (i.e. hard to follow a thread forward through literature unless someone has written a review)
-
I see what you mean. So sort of like collections of theoretically related work?
-
Not exactly collections, more like threads that link papers together. Still working on the idea of course.
-
Linked-list style?
-
Haha, I almost used that phrase knowing your background. Yes, except with multiple branches.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
