-
-
These words, and many other related notions, have dramatically different (yet also fine and nuanced) differences in context of modelling.
-
A lot of solutions proposed to "fix" empirical work just don't apply to computational experiments.
-
Some discussion here on replication in computational modelling for those who might be interested: https://openlab-flowers.inria.fr/uploads/default/original/1X/65addc14bb2a6a7feaf7690865fa3708d5b0990f.pdf …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You might enjoy what our journal concept will bring to the table with regards to cumulative theory. I'll keep you in the loop if you wish.
-
I'm not sure what you mean, but yeah, sure.

-
I mean, allowing comp. models to generate predictions that are tracked through the literature as they are evaluated. Connecting threads..
-
I wasn't under the impression that it's currently not something that's facilitated/allowed...?
-
My hope is that we can make such theoretical threads more explicit. Currently the only "glue" is in the narrative of the papers, and it >
-
only extends in a backwards direction. (i.e. hard to follow a thread forward through literature unless someone has written a review)
-
I see what you mean. So sort of like collections of theoretically related work?
-
Not exactly collections, more like threads that link papers together. Still working on the idea of course.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.