That is, psych ppl have a tendency to apply psych to themselves. Makes sense, but also causes issues with ppl running in meta-circles.>
-
-
Ppl will not say "this offends me", but instead go for "this does not offend me, but it might be exclusive and offend others"; then argue>
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
about the reaction to that meta-offense. I'm guilty of that stuff myself, I feel it's a dead end. Also think it can be counterproductive>
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
In particular, I dislike how ppl bring up "oh but we cannot do this because it alienates minorities/women/ECRs." I think the intention is>
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
a good one, but it is alienating to me bc I AM a min female ECR and it boggles my mind how many ppl speak out on behalf of ppl like me.>
4 replies 1 retweet 20 likes -
Agree that many peeps out there doing great things for inclusivity and div, and *sometimes* ppl need to speak out for those without voice>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
But sometimes, we need to get off the meta-level and just be ppl instead of psychologists imho
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @dingding_peng @DrPrimestein
It bugs *me* that when I try to talk to people about open science, they feel like this is a closed community.
4 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
This is a great convo. Reminds me of an online message board for vegans - a big problem, as I saw it - ppl being absolutist/holier than thou
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MarkCoster_Chem @mcxfrank and
I'm amused by how many so far have paralleled veganism with open science. It's a funny metaphor that works especially when one is aware of
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
how veganism (not eating animal products) and vegan culture/rhetoric (so so much other stuff, anti-GMO, for example) diverge!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.