Naturally, this works both ways. :)
-
-
Replying to @paweljmatusz @waterlego and
I'm guessing the preferred direction of the biais is gendered
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @c_perrodin @waterlego and
call women younger, and men older, perhaps? /2
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @paweljmatusz @c_perrodin and
I think it's also sexism too. There's so many cases of women being demoted that the variance has to be explained by someth to do w sexism.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @paweljmatusz and
"she can't be a postdoc / prof /etc because women don't typically make it that far"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @paweljmatusz and
It might be totally unmotivated by "women are inferior" explicitly, but it's certainly something about picking up on the stats of how women
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @paweljmatusz and
aren't as well represented the higher up we move academically.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @paweljmatusz and
And yes, like others have noted in other threads the men tend to be promoted overall and the women tend to be demoted.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @paweljmatusz and
I had a case recently of somebody outside academia refusing to believe in not an undergrad, another saying "you could be doing a phd" etc.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
It's the constant noise in my life with respect to my work when I talk to non academics. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.