Negative take on preprints. IMHO doesn't mention true criticism: feedback will disproportionately be, & already is, given to "better" labs.https://twitter.com/SmallPondSci/status/889440829848395776 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
A compliment implies you can use it to get more PR, right? But if most ppl get no feedback/comments then it's a false promise?
The fact is that feedback responses are distributed, and this is the reality that should be communicated by preprint 'advocates' et al :)
OK, to be extra clear: that was my point with my opening tweet.
I... did not get that from your opening tweet! Thanks for clarifying!
Given all the pros and cons of preprints being discussed the least discussed one is that they work better for "better" labs.
At least this is true for what I see on twitter when they are discussed, hence why I tweeted what I did.
If only research institutions had weekly #preprintJCs where the group submitted comments and reviews... #asapbio
Even so, wouldn't the deck be hugely stacked in favor of big/famous labs in terms of what gets discussed?
Perhaps true, but, at least now, there aren't that many preprints in my field so for #preprintJC we run out of "big names" quickly.
Interesting — which sub-area is that?
Because if it's broadly neuroscience I don't believe you! 
There's like 2-3 new neuro-themed preprints just on my TL every week!
Systems (Auditory) Neuroscience.
Yeah, that's obviously really specialised. I appreciate how it's tough to find many preprints in that area
Only if you make that promise in the first place - I prefer to state that it's a possibility, not a guarantee. I.e., can, not will.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.