Image posted by @daniellecrobins (https://portraitofthescientist.wordpress.com/2017/07/03/so-what-do-you-actually-do/ …) created by @rchampieux is super useful for explaining what #OpenScience is. 
pic.twitter.com/ILkSrPFgPg
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Inclusivity very important, but seems like a separate problem than open science. Link to explanation of why association necessary?
To be clear: I agree inclusivity is an issue that needs to be addressed, even in open science.
I think you answered your own question? Inclusivity and diversity are important because otherwise who are we opening up science to?
Important but different goals? Open science is improvement regardless of inclusivity; inclusivity necessary regardless of open science.
Nonsense.
Accessible to all means everybody, inclusivity, diversity.
Yep agreed. I think I need to re-think what I was asking :)
Was just talking today about the word I'd want to use to describe #openscience - and for me it's "inclusion" - that's what I want its CENTRAL focus to be - I want to be including ALL the people doing, reviewing, publishing, supporting, reproducing, reading, etc. the science
Absolutely. I feel we are building infrastructure, teams, practices, networks. Doing that *without* inclusive & diverse builds what??
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.