Don't see the incoherence though... seems perfectly viable analogy to illustrate the simplicity of ideologies
Yeah, you have that whiff about you. Also yes, it's an ideology just like any worldview is an ideology.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideology
-
-
Hhmmm... so would you call a theory of how neurons communicate (eg. population vs assembly coding) ideologies?
-
What does it matter what I would call anything? I speak in private language 100%.
-
None of the words I type mean a single thing to you. Our semantics overlap exactly 0%.

-
Not true, I actually find it interesting and entertaining, even though our semantics indeed do not overlap
-
But 0%, common... have a little "faith" at least 25%, no? Pretty please...
-
I don't do favours for internet peeps.
-
Aha, I understand. I'll send the request via a post pigeon then...
-
Not speckled Jim tho pls thx.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Altho I'll grant you that your ideology is not believing your ideology is an ideology. Log-posers think that. It's amusing and diagnostic.
-
Fair enough, but clearly an atheist vs. a deist is very different in how the "ideology" shapes their everyday lives (while neither=religion)
-
I feel like I'm back in 2010.
-
Which is like... forever ago...
-
I can infer that forever might mean 7 years for you.
-
At least in
orbit yes!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
now that is funny! (For real, not being sarcastic). But Ockham is only valid if 'all other variables are equal'. "History greets back"
. But I wouldn't call reductionism and empiricism ideology, but rather theory of science.