Too early to be thinking about academic misconduct, need coffee! 

create a flow of communication on the thing you're doing. But maybe that's just me. Either way, I think we roughly agree.
-
-
If you rush to publish something somebody presented and it's not published yet and you just cite their talk, I would worry. There's cases
-
where it's a small idea or method or something not massive. But if you lift their whole project that's weird even if you cite them. That was
-
what people in this thread are worried about.
-
Public talks are one thing ; confidential situations are another e.g. Reviewing papers, project proposals.The latter is def unethical.
-
Yeah, we covered that somewhere in this huge thread. I know of cases where reviewers stole ideas wholesale and published them, while keeping
-
the paper under reviewer on purpose.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.