OK, same thing though at the end of the day. If they cite you you will find out. It seems really antisocial to me for somebody to use your
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
unpublished idea without discussing it with you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
How can they cite you if you've not published it? That was the point of my "they must tell you".
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti and
Footnote O Guest p.c. Is the standard way
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alexandersclark @DaniRabaiotti and
My assumption is that in private communication there is an implicit or explicit feel for what the conversation is about and a quasi informed
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
consent from both parties that what is discussed might be used by the other and then as you say cited. The context above was not only about
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
private communication but also other things like presentations, posters, etc. Those aren't under pc as far as I'm concerned. Regardless, I'm
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
glad you at least agree that it should be cited when it is pc. Although I personally would appreciate any reference to our private convo to
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
first be passed by me if you're using something I came up with.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
The thing is that pc doesn't neatly fit into what I was discussing above. And I made it very clear that disclosing stuff in private should
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
be done carefully as there are bad actors who might not cite you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.