The important thing to realise is if another lab makes your science harder to do that's malicious behaviour for all intents and purposes.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti and
And so all my advice about staying away from them and so on applies. If you think another lab where on purpose or not will make your science
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti and
that much harder to do, label it as malicious.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti and
Too early to be thinking about academic misconduct, need coffee!

1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti and
Also to be clear, if somebody is working on the same thing sees you're doing something similar and uses something you came up, a method
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti and
an analysis anything that's more yours than common knowledge, and publishes it without telling you... That's scooping & certainly malicious.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti and
Disagree; no obligation to tell you about it, but an obligation to cite/credit you for sure.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexandersclark @DaniRabaiotti and
OK, same thing though at the end of the day. If they cite you you will find out. It seems really antisocial to me for somebody to use your
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
unpublished idea without discussing it with you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
How can they cite you if you've not published it? That was the point of my "they must tell you".
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
The context here is unpublished work being scooped. You can't scoop something published, although you can be quite strange and not cite it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.