But you're absolutely right that the malice case is real. I wonder if there needs to be diff words for accidental vs. intentional cases?
-
-
Too early to be thinking about academic misconduct, need coffee!


-
Also to be clear, if somebody is working on the same thing sees you're doing something similar and uses something you came up, a method
-
an analysis anything that's more yours than common knowledge, and publishes it without telling you... That's scooping & certainly malicious.
-
Even if their excuse is "sorry I forgot you came up with that"... Well, if they are indeed sorry they publish a correction stating as such!
-
This is exactly that situation in which a preprint can only strengthen your argument and demonstrate to others you came up with it.
-
IMHO this is one of the rarest ways people scoop. Needs so much data and experimental overlap for them to steal your method of idea.
-
Ah, def a field difference: in astro this is probably more common b/c there’s a lot of methodological overlap even for v diff sci results
-
I addressed this in a side thread. Solved by preprints in many cases. That's certainly in part observational data vs exp data, like you say.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.