I really hope that's true and not just on twitter. Pepper on here are genuinely very different subgroups than those I interact with offline.
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @Darren_Rhodes and
Also no effect is sort of OK, but the super best thing is to also understand why it didn't work (as much as can be). Something which I also
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Darren_Rhodes and
Seems like befit of understanding why it didn't work is proportional to degree of evidenced/theory it should have.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flourneuro @Darren_Rhodes and
I'm not sure if follow. So you mean if it testing a well specified theory then it's easier to see where it failed? I can think of counter
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @flourneuro and
examples to that where utterly bad experiments can still be explained because one sees what went wrong. Maybe I've misunderstood you tho?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Darren_Rhodes and
I agree if "one sees what went wrong" can include "what went wrong is there's no prior reason to have expected that manipulation to work"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flourneuro @o_guest and
The (stupid) example I keep thinking of is trying to turn on the lights by cracking eggs into a bowl
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @flourneuro @Darren_Rhodes and
I'm having trouble with your specific point. It's quite late so I'm probably very out of it, my fault! I'll try and sleep and reread soon.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Darren_Rhodes and
Haha Maybe I will sleep too and try to rephrase.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
It's after 1am here so I really should regardless!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
