This is one of many reasons I'm weary and wary of books, if it's the case they propose stuff outside of what has been peer reviewed, cos
-
-
I'm so exhausted and cautious of books which do this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
For what it is worth, they are very clear with what they are speculating about and what is proven. It's got a lot of discussion.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LEMacKz
Ah, that's great. Thanks for the info — appreciate the papers! One last question out of curiosity again they don't mention Orch-OR, right?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
They mention that microtubles are too big for quantum effects and mention that this theory has been debunked.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest
Yeah they have about 4 pages on it. They go onto discuss QM and selective ion channels and action potentials.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
With regards to Orch-OR: "it is fair to say that his proposal has, to date, few adherents in the quantum physics community"
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
"calculations suggest that quantum coherence in microtubules could not be maintained for timescales of longer than a few picoseconds...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
... far too fleeting a time to have any impact on brain computation"
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Great stuff. Glad they say this.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

nice one