OK, what metric would you like? E.g., I can see a trend in my field between preprints from "good" labs and the comments they get on biorXiv.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @schneiderleonid and
The "better" the lab the more feedback and comments. Not looking like meritocracy?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @schneiderleonid and
Also altmetrics, I can bet you the "better" the lab the higher the altmetrics. I have noticed this trend too.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @schneiderleonid and
OMG please stop adding Oliver back in — already asked to be removed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @schneiderleonid and
I think your facetious replies "everyone founds their own journal" and "research about research about research" aren't going down well with
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @schneiderleonid and
ppl & definitely not with me, so I'll leave you be for a bit because I still think you might be doing this all in bad faith for some reason.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
thank you for patronising, I'm happy to leave this bizarre, well, debate it hardly is.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schneiderleonid @o_guest and
There is no need to be so rude you know
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DaniRabaiotti @schneiderleonid and
You were so rude to the others that I'm genuinely confused about how to treat you other than to think you're not replying in good faith.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @DaniRabaiotti and
Either way, I hope that at some point you consider that preprints and in fact anything including open sci generally are biased towards elite
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
labs because people are people are sadly many like hierarchies.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.