I'm not sure anybody has proposed current editorial practises are OK. In fact, quite the opposite. We are pointing out it's biased often.
OK, what metric would you like? E.g., I can see a trend in my field between preprints from "good" labs and the comments they get on biorXiv.
-
-
The "better" the lab the more feedback and comments. Not looking like meritocracy?
-
Also altmetrics, I can bet you the "better" the lab the higher the altmetrics. I have noticed this trend too.
-
OMG please stop adding Oliver back in — already asked to be removed.
-
I think your facetious replies "everyone founds their own journal" and "research about research about research" aren't going down well with
-
ppl & definitely not with me, so I'll leave you be for a bit because I still think you might be doing this all in bad faith for some reason.
-
thank you for patronising, I'm happy to leave this bizarre, well, debate it hardly is.
-
There is no need to be so rude you know

-
You were so rude to the others that I'm genuinely confused about how to treat you other than to think you're not replying in good faith.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.