I'm not sure "more paranoia" is an apt description of blind reviews?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
Surely it's very scary for ECRs if they are openly new and naive (ie their name is obviously of an unknown)?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
Also I don't feel these pressures or stresses myself because of my personality in this specific thing, so it's good to listen to others.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
But women or people with "foreign" names could easily be treated worse because of open review, you can imagine that right?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
Nobody will be treated worse in open peer review, quite the opposite. Ask editors. Problem is, if there is one, with more leniency.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schneiderleonid @o_guest and
I am an editor; there is much evidence of biases in the review process which are alleviated by blind review. also aware of my own biases.
1 reply 4 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @alexandersclark @o_guest and
wow, you tweet's popularity and me being its only critic suggests there is nothing wrong with traditional editorial practices. Glad to hear!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schneiderleonid @alexandersclark and
I'm not sure anybody has proposed current editorial practises are OK. In fact, quite the opposite. We are pointing out it's biased often.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @schneiderleonid and
It's a more subtle point we are making: any changes need to be borne out of a serious evaluation of the systemic issues.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @schneiderleonid and
Blinded review is not the same as closed review. In fact blinding, which can be lifted after reviewing is done, might have a place in OS.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Open science is about more meaning than just making everything transparent all the time, but also making everything more accessible.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @schneiderleonid and
And by accessible that means eliminating sources of bias against minorities and ERCs. I hope we can agree on some of these ideals.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @alexandersclark and
Entirely agreed, that's part of why those of us advocating for open science need to do so critically, mindful of failure modalities.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.