Surely it's very scary for ECRs if they are openly new and naive (ie their name is obviously of an unknown)?
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
Also I don't feel these pressures or stresses myself because of my personality in this specific thing, so it's good to listen to others.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
But women or people with "foreign" names could easily be treated worse because of open review, you can imagine that right?
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
Nobody will be treated worse in open peer review, quite the opposite. Ask editors. Problem is, if there is one, with more leniency.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schneiderleonid @o_guest and
There is literally zero reason to believe this
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @schneiderleonid and
The quote in the OP is from an editor. Semine is an editor.
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @annemscheel and
But hey — at least I didn't call her Geoff! h/t
@io_r_uspic.twitter.com/Tx4Kx40Rhi
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes
@nature you might want to look into this slip!
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @annemscheel and
Yeah, its the photographer credit. Its in an HTML tag of class "credit". But yes, it looks wrong there!
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
