Surely it's very scary for ECRs if they are openly new and naive (ie their name is obviously of an unknown)?
Paranoia that you're being mean? Or that you'll start a vendetta?
-
-
Latter, of course.
-
So open review leads to censure as scientists strive to avoid vendettas?
-
If peer review is constructive, it can be signed. Published are only reviews of accepted papers.
-
Come on, reviews can (should) always be signed and *should* always be constructive, with independence of the outcome.
-
Even blind review could allow this. First, blinded then published and open. Not claiming it's the best system, but also not convinced always
-
open is best either. Would like to see evidence to make informed opinions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.