Seems like others agree w us regarding potential downsides of open review. #openscience
CC: @kopshtik @Julie_B92 @blahah404 @DaniRabaiotti
-
-
*Simine
-
And apologies to Simine.

-
But hey — at least I didn't call her Geoff! h/t
@io_r_uspic.twitter.com/Tx4Kx40Rhi
-
@nature you might want to look into this slip! -
Yeah, its the photographer credit. Its in an HTML tag of class "credit". But yes, it looks wrong there!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
To ignore author's status is not same as introducing additional levels of secrecy. Or shall we all tweet under assumed names also?
-
Blind to authors' identities sounds like blind review to me.
-
Also there's a diff between 100% always blind, and blind just during review process. After publication the whole review could be attached
-
with paper and names. But I'm genuinely interested in evidence based review systems.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But why believe women right? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.