"One trick I use to avoid status bias is to keep myself blind to the authors' identities" @siminevazire
http://www.nature.com/news/our-obsession-with-eminence-warps-research-1.22251 …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @siminevazire
Seems like others agree w us regarding potential downsides of open review.
#openscience CC: @kopshtik@Julie_B92@blahah404@DaniRabaiotti4 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @siminevazire and
I'm not sure if more paranoia in science is the way to go though. Double-blind will scare peer reviewers even more: what if it's some1 big?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @schneiderleonid @o_guest and
This is literally the opposite of what URMs are afraid of ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @schneiderleonid and
Also I can find the ref if you want, but there was a study that found that bigshot publications had higher success rates when blinded
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @Julie_B92 @schneiderleonid and
I'm not sure "more paranoia" is an apt description of blind reviews?
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @Julie_B92 and
Well, one-way blind peer reviews already lead authors to plan revenge on those they suspect if being their reviewers. Science runs on fear.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yeah, vendetta can be planned even better if you know who did it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.