yeah I think they made screenshots of @EikoFried's code - so I would go with posting .R on OSF
-
-
Replying to @rogierK @sTeamTraen and
Yes we submitted code as .txt. Journal made screenshots and put it as jpg in appendix..
4 replies 2 retweets 13 likes -
-
They fixed it after a few emails. Here the original for you (had to zip, WP doesn't like .docx) http://eiko-fried.com/wp-content/uploads/127_2016_1319_MOESM1_ESM.docx.zip …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @EikoFried @o_guest and
Good times ...pic.twitter.com/8Dk0Ddjdp7
1 reply 24 retweets 49 likes -
Replying to @EikoFried @rogierK and
Wow... speechless... although sadly not surprised at all. So much unprofessionalism is coming to the surface these days.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I guess it's what you get when publishing science is a financial business. Probably not good for quality..
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @EikoFried @o_guest and
Publishing science has always been a for-profit business. Problem is the tail is wagging the dog (and the dog loves it).
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @sTeamTraen @EikoFried and
Not necessarily always: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science … "You have no idea how profitable these journals are once you stop doing anything."
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @j_theriault @sTeamTraen and
...or at least not at this scale.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Was going to post a link to that article. Not always for-profit, exactly, although as the article says back then stuff took ages to publish.
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @j_theriault and
Which didn't matter so much as the hype cycle was different then (or smaller, or perhaps non-existent, although I doubt that last one).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @sTeamTraen @j_theriault and
Yes, the system was different in essence: "months-long backlog of articles and relied on cash handouts".
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
