Oh, shit I guess we do!https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbnRJnMBBZM …
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
BTW I would avoid declaring a word statistically and historically used for men "hero" as gender neutral. In the same way "guys" is not
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
neutral I would hazard a guess "hero" might not be gender neutral. It might change but I don't think it has!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
Gender neutral and androgynous have themselves historically been more masculine than neutral, e.g., recall "he" declared as gender neutral
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
by many in the past or "guys" the same. There is a lot of femmephobia out there!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
You can 100% be agender or/and androgynous or even a cis man and still like femme stuff. But sadly, you get chastised for it. Even women do.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404 and
Thanks Olivia! Sorry to push this - would you recommend "heros and heroines" then? That feels super weird to me. Or just avoid in general?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404 and
I feel like I've wanted to say something like "you are all heros of <insert movement here>" in an inspirational way
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kirstie_j @blahah404 and
Why go for a noun that has inherent rendering? Why not something like: "leaders" "activists" "movers and shakers" "vanguard" etc?
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
rendering!!!! LOL I mean: gendering
-
-
Replying to @o_guest @kirstie_j and
I'm not even on my phone, my fingers just typed that on my physical keyboard
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.