If arXiv had HTML it would better is point @blahah404 and others have made.
-
-
-
Replying to @wandedob @blahah404
Why? HTML plus option to download pdf is bad?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @blahah404
With HTML it is always harder to know what is in the paper, because paper and homepage float together
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I will always prefer a standalone doc that i can simply save to my dropbox. Journals that force me through crap html to get my pdf annoy me
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Useful points.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Indeed, crap HTML is a problem. Perfectly possible to have single document HTML self-contained like a PDF, and other options
3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
And then I have to print it to pdf if i want to be able to open it on all my devices?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
You think pdfs look good on mobile? I much prefer mobile ready HTML CSS
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'd much rather a pdf for consistency. Especially until we have hand annotation of html sorted too
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You can have both!
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.