My practical experience is that people can develop quite serious antipathy against a person who they think is 'after them' based on...
-
-
Replying to @DennisEckmeier @pvanheus and
... Who they think a rev is, when it may really be several different people who across several reviews are finding similar weaknesses.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DennisEckmeier @pvanheus and
I don't want to be the person they *think* is actively giving them a hard time.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DennisEckmeier @pvanheus and
Maybe not practical experience, let's call it observation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DennisEckmeier @pvanheus and
Also, I'm aware of many cases where reviewer anonymity is not respected. Meaning that people tell each other who reviewed whom...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DennisEckmeier @pvanheus and
In some cases personal confrontation and making misbehavior known in the field works to keep individuals in check, in other cases not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DennisEckmeier @pvanheus and
I don't think there is an optimal solution, especially if we continue to allow enormous power differences between researchers.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Thanks. Yes this is the heart of the problem.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @pvanheus @DennisEckmeier and
Women consistently are listened to less than men and not taken as seriously. The case you gave above means sometimes you will be respected
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I worry about cases without any blinding in which biases are consistent against certain groups, e.g., women.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
What solutions do we have for this?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.