It hardly matters. Their editors re-write the article to suit their style and interests after it passes peer review anyway.
-
-
-
Replying to @o_guest
Yep. It was like someone else had written a paper about the same thing and stuck our names on it.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @ryneches
Oh, right this actually happened to you... have you blogged about it? I'm really interested to hear the story!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Well, no. It's one of a long list of problems with the magazines. I actually was mostly happy with what they wrote, it was just... weird.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @ryneches
Huh — so it ended well. I mean, I guess that's something!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Yeah. We got proofs to review before publication. But it was weird to realize that it is a magazine article ABOUT the research, not a paper.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @ryneches
I think that might be something I already have accepted and come to terms with. So maybe it won't be *as* weird for me. But who knows...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Also that being said I'm obviously not gonna get published — the chances are so slim.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest
Well, if the project is cool, it will get accepted somewhere. Don't feed the monster by attaching too much importance as to where. :-)
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Oh, I'm genuinely not that worried. But thanks for the sage advice. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.