I've thought a lot about this thread, and not sure I agree. Saying there's no social identity for open science does not make it so. 1/13https://twitter.com/annemscheel/status/877159427085828097 …
-
-
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
And without condemning/condoning, I think much of this is evidenced in the ways we OS practitioners talk about those who don't use OS. 2/13
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
We ostracize folks who we think do crappy science (insert favorite case study here), based on low power, p-hacking, etc., 3/13
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
So while we might not expel from OS club, we clearly are capable of punishing folks whose scientific values don't line up with our own. 4/13
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk
Which brings us to what I understand as the point made by
@o_guest : K used OS to effectively dox thousands of OKC users. 5/131 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk @o_guest
Little concern for ethical considerations/empathy for those who might be affected (this is twitter documented, not heresay)… 6/13
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @JohnSakaluk @o_guest
Then K said it was all in the name of OS, after "publishing" in "journal" K "edits".
@EmilyGorcenski among 1st to take K to task. 7/131 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
If we can shun _______ for p-hacking--which conflicts with our scientific values--why not same treatment for K? 8/13
3 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Has this not happened? I and others condemned the OKC incident at the time as being incompatible with OS values; we don't interact w/ K
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @richarddmorey @JohnSakaluk and
Is there a definition of "shun" that I'm not getting here? it looks in my corner like he's "shunned"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
I'm sure he was. But other people didn't react as appropriately as you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.