I'll be the first to agree that we have major problems.
I've explained this so many times. They defended him because they assumed the data was in good condition faith. If it's ok I'll link you.
-
-
Condition* was a typo from phone
-
Please read as much as possible because Emily was at ground 0 first time round, including some other of my friends.https://twitter.com/o_guest/status/877530276234240000 …
-
I am probably being thick but I don't see what this tweet has to do with any earlier case or where people were defending him?
-
The whole thread explains it, certainly not that one tweet alone. Twitter threads are tough. Sorry. Alternatively look around on Google for
-
stories from back then, or take our word on it.
-
The thread is long and I've spent days on twitter constantly rehashing all of this. So I'm utterly spent on the matter.
-
I know how it feels. I don't like Twitter discussions for that very reason (& I might owe
@richarddmorey another drink for this?:P)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks that'd be helpful... In any case, I agree ppl defending racists should also be challenged in the way racists should be challenged!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.