That would normally be expected, non?
-
-
Replying to @chbergma @blahah404 and
Certainly was ignored but was initially supported as opposed to decried. URMs probably saw this.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This is a lot of thread but I'm just gonna say that EK was not a wistful naïf who tried real hard but messed up.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @o_guest and
He has a patter of outwardly racist research that begs the question, zero concern for research ethics, and cavaliet dismissal of critique.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @o_guest and
He doesn't want to be a member of the OS/OD communities. He wants to use it as a smokescreen for racism.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @o_guest and
Whatever point is being made about OS/OD here, EK is not an exemplar of any of it. He is flatly immoral, and tries to use OS to cover that.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @o_guest and
yup we're all on the same page about that - I think we're introspecting about how to handle it better in future
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest and
TBH I think it got handled well in real time. One important takeaway: ethic of openness doesn't override ethics of research and science.
1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @blahah404 and
Most important thing is to not lose forest for trees because we're so dogmatic/attached to openness principle
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @blahah404 and
Indeedy! He's been releasing shit again if you noticed. And when I said we should call him out some OS ppl reacted by saying "we aren't a
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
community, Olivia, ergo we do not need to do anything" which I found disappointing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.