And this novice might work against years of training in closed science, so the response should be encouragement and friendly correction
-
-
Closed science still has ethical oversight.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Oh I know of tons of examples where ethics simply are ignored because it's too much trouble and who will know...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I want science to be better. I'm gonna call out K because I want to improve it, even if there are 1k others, we have to start somewhere!
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
not a psych person but this makes me think of the effect where ppl ignore a problem so the anyone who doesn't ignore it gets all the work
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @blahah404 @o_guest and
Btw perception is funny bc subjective: for me it wasn't ignored. And were there any real-life consequences? I remember sth in that direction
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chbergma @blahah404 and
That would normally be expected, non?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @chbergma @blahah404 and
Certainly was ignored but was initially supported as opposed to decried. URMs probably saw this.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This is a lot of thread but I'm just gonna say that EK was not a wistful naïf who tried real hard but messed up.
2 replies 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @EmilyGorcenski @o_guest and
He has a patter of outwardly racist research that begs the question, zero concern for research ethics, and cavaliet dismissal of critique.
2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
[Emily! Can I just say TURBO BIG thank you and many offers of virtual hugs for your efforts on this issue and in general.
]
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.