Its your prerogative whether you call others out for misapplications/misrepresentations of your OS values, 11/13
-
-
Good points. Tho the context I was aware of = graph of bell curve data. Quite diff to wat you described. I'd agree wid u on context u giv.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's interesting how others, e.g.,
@blahah404 and here John, have had much more success with conveying my initial message — what is diff?3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @JohnSakaluk and
Context. Your retweet was of bell curve data usage. John's rant spoke of a different issue. bell curve data usage didn't reveal private info
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @farid_anvari @JohnSakaluk and
Twitter is hard, but it was mentioned often by me and others and I linked to this many times: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Emil_O._W._Kirkegaard …
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @JohnSakaluk and
I read part of that link. It still seemed like you wanted condemnation of his bell curve data usage. Twitter is difficult, yes.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @farid_anvari @JohnSakaluk and
I have seen condemnation from within the community a lot in that thread. I have shared condemnation and articles against his points.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @o_guest @JohnSakaluk and
but that doesn't mean I am required to condemn bell curve data usage because I like OA. That's my only point of diff wid u on this.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @farid_anvari @JohnSakaluk and
You aren't _required_ to do anything. But I think the gulf of our disagreement is pretty big.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
You went from only point of diff to agreeing it's a gulf of diff — wow, I changed your mind on something albeit about a meta issue. 
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.